This article includes brief description of ELF structure and principles of its usage. It is used to provide the solution for intercepting function calls from one library into another one.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. The problem
1.1 What does redirecting mean?
1.2 Why redirecting?
2. Brief ELF explanation
2.1 Which parts does ELF file consist of?
2.2 How do shared ELF libraries link?
2.3 Some useful conclusions
3. The solution
3.1 What is the algorithm of redirection?
3.2 How to get the address, which a library has been loaded to?
3.3 How to write and restore a new function address?
4. Instead of conclusion
5. Useful links
We all use Dynamic Link Libraries (DLL). They have excellent facilities. First, such library loads into the physical address space only once for all processes. Secondly, you can expand the functionality of the program by loading the additional library, which will provide this functionality. And that is without restarting the program. Also a problem of updating is solved. It is possible to define the standard interface for the DLL and to influence the functionality and the quality of the basic program by changing the version of the library. Such methods of the code reusability were called “plug-in architecture”. But let’s move on.
Of course, not every dynamic link library relies only on itself in its implementation, namely, on the computational power of the processor and the memory. Libraries use libraries or just standard libraries. For example, programs in the C\C++ language use standard C\C++ libraries. The latter, besides, are also organized into the dynamic link form (libc.so and libstdc++.so). They are stored in the files of the specific format. My research was held for Linux OS where the main format of dynamic link libraries is ELF (Executable and Linkable Format).
Recently I faced the necessity of intercepting function calls from one library into another - just to process them in such a way. This is called the call redirecting.
First, let’s formulate the problem on the concrete example. Supposing we have a program called «test» on the C language (test.c file) and two split libraries (libtest1.c and libtest2.c files) with permanent contents and which were compiled beforehand. These libraries provide functions:
libtest2(), respectively. In their implementation each of them uses the
puts() function from the standard library of the C language.
A task consists in the following:
- To replace the call of the
puts()function for both libraries by the call of the redirected
puts()function. The latter is implemented in the master program (test.c file) that can in its turn use the original
- To cancel the performed changes, that is to make so that the repeated call of
libtest2()leads to the call of the original
It is not allowed to change the code or recompile the libraries. We can change only the master program.
This example illustrates two interesting specifics of such redirection:
1) It is performed only for one concrete dynamic link library and not for all the process like during the use of
LD_PRELOAD environment variable of the dynamic loader. That helps other modules to use the original function trouble-free.
2) It is performed during the program work and does not require its restart.
Where can it be applied? For example, in your program with the variety of plug-ins, you can intercept its calls to system resources or some other libraries. It will not influence other plug-ins and the application itself. Or you can also do the same things from your own plug-in to another application.
How to solve this task? The only variant that came in my mind was to examine ELF and perform corresponding changes in the memory myself.
The best way to understand ELF is to hold your breath and to read its specification attentively several times. Then write a simple program, compile it and examine it in details with the help of the hexadecimal editor, comparing it with the specification. Such method of examination gives the idea of writing some ELF parser because a lot of chore may appear. But do not be in a hurry. Such utilities have been already created. Let’s take files from the previous part for the examination:
It is necessary to look into such file to answer this question. The following utilities exist for this purpose:
- readelf – a very powerful tool for viewing contents of the ELF file sections
- objdump – it is similar to the previous tool, and it can disassemble the sections
- gdb – it is irreplaceable for debug under Linux OS, especially for viewing places liable to relocation
Relocation is a special term for the place in the ELF file, which refers to the other module symbol. The static (ld) or dynamic (ld-linux.so.2) linker\loader deals with the direct modification of such places.
Any ELF file begins with the special header. Its structure, as well as the description of many other elements of the ELF file, can be found in the /usr/include/linux/elf.h file. The header has a special field, in which the offset from the beginning of the section header table is written. Each element of this table describes some specific section in the ELF file. A section is the smallest indivisible structure element in the ELF file. During loading into the memory, sections are combined into segments. Segments are the smallest indivisible elements of the ELF file, which can be mapped to the memory by the loader (ld-linux.so.2). Segments are described in the table of segments, whose offset is also displayed in the ELF file header.
The most important of them are:
- .text – contains the module code
- .data – initialized variables
- .bss – non-initialized variables
- .symtab – the module symbols: functions and static variables
- .strtab – the names for module symbols
- .rel.text –the relocation for functions (for statically linked modules)
- .rel.data – the relocation for static variables (for statically linked modules)
- .rel.plt – the list of elements in the PLT (Procedure Linkage Table), which are liable to the relocation during the dynamic linking (if PLT is used)
- .rel.dyn – the relocation for dynamically linked functions (if PLT is not used)
- .got – Global Offset Table, contains the information about the offsets of relocated objects
- .debug –the debug information
Let’s perform the following commands for the compilation of files listed above:
gcc -g3 -m32 -shared -o libtest1.so libtest1.c gcc -g3 -m32 -fPIC -shared -o libtest2.so libtest2.c gcc -g3 -m32 -L$PWD -o test test.c -ltest1 -ltest2 –ldl
The first command creates the dynamic link library libtest1.so. The second creates libtest2.so. Pay attention to the
–fPIC key. It makes the compiler generate the so-called Position Independent Code. Details can be found in the next part of the article. The third command creates the executable module with the name “test” by means of the test.c file compilation and by linking it to the already created libtest1.so and libtest2.so libraries. The latter are in the current directory, what is indicated by
–L$PWD key. Linking to libdl.so is necessary for using the
To start the program, perform the following commands:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH ./test
That is to add the path to the current directory as a path for the library search to the dynamic linker\loader. The program output will be the next:
libtest1: 1st call to the original puts() libtest1: 2nd call to the original puts() libtest2: 1st call to the original puts() libtest2: 2nd call to the original puts() -----------------------------
Now let’s look at the test module sections. Start readelf with the
–a key for it. The most interesting examples are displayed below:
ELF Header: Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Class: ELF32 Data: 2's complement, little endian Version: 1 (current) OS/ABI: UNIX - System V ABI Version: 0 Type: EXEC (Executable file) Machine: Intel 80386 Version: 0x1 Entry point address: 0x8048580 Start of program headers: 52 (bytes into file) Start of section headers: 21256 (bytes into file) Flags: 0x0 Size of this header: 52 (bytes) Size of program headers: 32 (bytes) Number of program headers: 8 Size of section headers: 40 (bytes) Number of section headers: 39 Section header string table index: 36
This is the standard header of the executable module, a magic sequence in the first 16 bytes. The module type (in this case – executable, but also can be object (.o) and shared (.so)), architecture (i386), recommended entry point, offsets to the headers of segments and sections, and their size are indicated. At the very end of it is the offset in the string table for the headers of the sections.
Section Headers: [Nr] Name Type Addr Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al [ 0] NULL 00000000 000000 000000 00 0 0 0 [ 1] .interp PROGBITS 08048134 000134 000013 00 A 0 0 1 ... [ 5] .dynsym DYNSYM 08048200 000200 000110 10 A 6 1 4 [ 6] .dynstr STRTAB 08048310 000310 0000df 00 A 0 0 1 ... [ 9] .rel.dyn REL 08048464 000464 000010 08 A 5 0 4  .rel.plt REL 08048474 000474 000040 08 A 5 12 4  .init PROGBITS 080484b4 0004b4 000030 00 AX 0 0 4  .plt PROGBITS 080484e4 0004e4 000090 04 AX 0 0 4  .text PROGBITS 08048580 000580 0001fc 00 AX 0 0 16  .fini PROGBITS 0804877c 00077c 00001c 00 AX 0 0 4  .rodata PROGBITS 08048798 000798 00005c 00 A 0 0 4 ...  .dynamic DYNAMIC 08049f08 000f08 0000e8 08 WA 6 0 4  .got PROGBITS 08049ff0 000ff0 000004 04 WA 0 0 4  .got.plt PROGBITS 08049ff4 000ff4 00002c 04 WA 0 0 4  .data PROGBITS 0804a020 001020 000008 00 WA 0 0 4  .bss NOBITS 0804a028 001028 00000c 00 WA 0 0 4 ...  .debug_pubnames PROGBITS 00000000 0011b8 000040 00 0 0 1  .debug_info PROGBITS 00000000 0011f8 0004d9 00 0 0 1  .debug_abbrev PROGBITS 00000000 0016d1 000156 00 0 0 1  .debug_line PROGBITS 00000000 001827 000309 00 0 0 1  .debug_frame PROGBITS 00000000 001b30 00003c 00 0 0 4  .debug_str PROGBITS 00000000 001b6c 00024e 01 MS 0 0 1 ...  .shstrtab STRTAB 00000000 0051a8 000160 00 0 0 1  .symtab SYMTAB 00000000 005920 000530 10 38 57 4  .strtab STRTAB 00000000 005e50 000268 00 0 0 1 Key to Flags: W (write), A (alloc), X (execute), M (merge), S (strings) I (info), L (link order), G (group), x (unknown) O (extra OS processing required) o (OS specific), p (processor specific)
Here you can see the list of all experimental ELF file sections, their type and mode of loading into the memory (R, W, X and A).
Program Headers: Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align PHDR 0x000034 0x08048034 0x08048034 0x00100 0x00100 R E 0x4 INTERP 0x000134 0x08048134 0x08048134 0x00013 0x00013 R 0x1 [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.2] LOAD 0x000000 0x08048000 0x08048000 0x007f8 0x007f8 R E 0x1000 LOAD 0x000ef4 0x08049ef4 0x08049ef4 0x00134 0x00140 RW 0x1000 DYNAMIC 0x000f08 0x08049f08 0x08049f08 0x000e8 0x000e8 RW 0x4 NOTE 0x000148 0x08048148 0x08048148 0x00020 0x00020 R 0x4 GNU_STACK 0x000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000 0x00000 RW 0x4 GNU_RELRO 0x000ef4 0x08049ef4 0x08049ef4 0x0010c 0x0010c R 0x1
This is the list of segments, peculiar containers for sections in the memory. Also the path to the special module (dynamic linker\loader) is indicated. It is it to range the contents of this ELF file in the memory.
Section to Segment mapping: Segment Sections... 00 01 .interp 02 .interp .note.ABI-tag .hash .gnu.hash .dynsym .dynstr .gnu.version .gnu.version_r .rel.dyn .rel.plt .init .plt .text .fini .rodata .eh_frame 03 .ctors .dtors .jcr .dynamic .got .got.plt .data .bss 04 .dynamic 05 .note.ABI-tag 06 07 .ctors .dtors .jcr .dynamic .got
And here, the allocation of the sections by segments during the load is displayed.
But the most interesting section, in which information about imported and exported dynamic link functions is stored, is called “.dynsym”:
Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 17 entries: Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name 0: 00000000 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT UND 1: 00000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND libtest2 2: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT UND __gmon_start__ 3: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT UND _Jv_RegisterClasses 4: 00000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND dlclose@GLIBC_2.0 (2) 5: 00000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.0 (3) 6: 00000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND libtest1 7: 00000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND dlopen@GLIBC_2.1 (4) 8: 00000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND fprintf@GLIBC_2.0 (3) 9: 00000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND puts@GLIBC_2.0 (3) 10: 0804a034 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS _end 11: 0804a028 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS _edata 12: 0804879c 4 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 15 _IO_stdin_used 13: 0804a028 4 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 24 stderr@GLIBC_2.0 (3) 14: 0804a028 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS __bss_start 15: 080484b4 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 _init 16: 0804877c 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 14 _fini
Besides other functions that are necessary for the correct program load\roll-out, you can find familiar names:
libtest1, libtest2, dlopen, fprintf, puts, dlclose. The FUNC type is meant for all of them and because they are not defined in this module – the index of the section is marked as UND.
The sections “.rel.dyn” and “.rel.plt” are the tables of relocation for those symbols from “.dynsym” that need relocation during the linking in general.
Relocation section '.rel.dyn' at offset 0x464 contains 2 entries: Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym. Name 08049ff0 00000206 R_386_GLOB_DAT 00000000 __gmon_start__ 0804a028 00000d05 R_386_COPY 0804a028 stderr Relocation section '.rel.plt' at offset 0x474 contains 8 entries: Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym. Name 0804a000 00000107 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 libtest2 0804a004 00000207 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 __gmon_start__ 0804a008 00000407 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 dlclose 0804a00c 00000507 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 __libc_start_main 0804a010 00000607 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 libtest1 0804a014 00000707 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 dlopen 0804a018 00000807 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 fprintf 0804a01c 00000907 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 puts
What is the difference between these tables from the point of view of the dynamic link of functions? This is the topic of the next part of the article.
The compilation of the libtest1.so and libtest2.so libraries somewhat differed. libtest2.so was compiled with the
–fPIC key (to generate Position Independent Code). Let’s look how it affected the tables of dynamic symbols for these two models (we use readelf):
Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 11 entries: Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name 0: 00000000 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT UND 1: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT UND __gmon_start__ 2: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT UND _Jv_RegisterClasses 3: 00000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND puts@GLIBC_2.0 (2) 4: 00000000 0 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT UND __cxa_finalize@GLIBC_2.1.3 (3) 5: 00002014 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS _end 6: 0000200c 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS _edata 7: 0000043c 32 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 libtest1 8: 0000200c 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS __bss_start 9: 0000031c 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 9 _init 10: 00000498 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 12 _fini
Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 11 entries: Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name 0: 00000000 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT UND 1: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT UND __gmon_start__ 2: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT UND _Jv_RegisterClasses 3: 00000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND puts@GLIBC_2.0 (2) 4: 00000000 0 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT UND __cxa_finalize@GLIBC_2.1.3 (3) 5: 00002018 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS _end 6: 00002010 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS _edata 7: 00002010 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS __bss_start 8: 00000304 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 9 _init 9: 0000043c 52 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 libtest2 10: 000004a8 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 12 _fini
So, the tables of dynamic symbols for both libraries differ only in the sequence order of the symbols themselves. It is clear that both of them use undefined puts() function, and grant
libtest2(). How have the tables of relocation changed?
Relocation section '.rel.dyn' at offset 0x2cc contains 8 entries: Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym. Name 00000445 00000008 R_386_RELATIVE 00000451 00000008 R_386_RELATIVE 00002008 00000008 R_386_RELATIVE 0000044a 00000302 R_386_PC32 00000000 puts 00000456 00000302 R_386_PC32 00000000 puts 00001fe8 00000106 R_386_GLOB_DAT 00000000 __gmon_start__ 00001fec 00000206 R_386_GLOB_DAT 00000000 _Jv_RegisterClasses 00001ff0 00000406 R_386_GLOB_DAT 00000000 __cxa_finalize Relocation section '.rel.plt' at offset 0x30c contains 2 entries: Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym. Name 00002000 00000107 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 __gmon_start__ 00002004 00000407 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 __cxa_finalize
As for libtest1.so, the relocation of the
puts() function is found twice in the “.rel.dyn” section. Let’s look at these places directly in the module with the help of the disassembler. It is necessary to find the
libtest1() function, in which the double call of the
puts() function takes place. We use objdump
0000043c <libtest1>: 43c: 55 push %ebp 43d: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp 43f: 83 ec 08 sub $0x8,%esp 442: c7 04 24 b4 04 00 00 movl $0x4b4,(%esp) 449: e8 fc ff ff ff call 44a <libtest1+0xe> 44e: c7 04 24 e0 04 00 00 movl $0x4e0,(%esp) 455: e8 fc ff ff ff call 456 <libtest1+0x1a> 45a: c9 leave 45b: c3 ret 45c: 90 nop 45d: 90 nop 45e: 90 nop 45f: 90 nop
We have two relative
CALL (E8 code) instructions with 0xFFFFFFFC operands. The relative
CALL with such operand makes no sense because it directs the control one byte ahead concerning the address of the
CALL instruction. If you look at the offset of the relocations for
puts() in the “.rel.dyn” section, you can see that they are applied to the operand of the
CALL instruction. Thus, in both cases of
puts() call, the loader will just rewrite 0xFFFFFFFC so that
CALL will jump to the correct address of the
The relocation of the
R_386_PC32 type works in the described way.
Now let’s pay attention to libtest2.so:
Relocation section '.rel.dyn' at offset 0x2cc contains 4 entries: Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym. Name 0000200c 00000008 R_386_RELATIVE 00001fe8 00000106 R_386_GLOB_DAT 00000000 __gmon_start__ 00001fec 00000206 R_386_GLOB_DAT 00000000 _Jv_RegisterClasses 00001ff0 00000406 R_386_GLOB_DAT 00000000 __cxa_finalize Relocation section '.rel.plt' at offset 0x2ec contains 3 entries: Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym. Name 00002000 00000107 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 __gmon_start__ 00002004 00000307 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 puts 00002008 00000407 R_386_JUMP_SLOT 00000000 __cxa_finalize
puts() call is mentioned only once and, besides, in the “.rel.plt” section. Let’s look at the assembler and perform the debug:
0000043c <libtest2>: 43c: 55 push %ebp 43d: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp 43f: 53 push %ebx 440: 83 ec 04 sub $0x4,%esp 443: e8 ef ff ff ff call 437 <__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx> 448: 81 c3 ac 1b 00 00 add $0x1bac,%ebx 44e: 8d 83 d0 e4 ff ff lea -0x1b30(%ebx),%eax 454: 89 04 24 mov %eax,(%esp) 457: e8 f8 fe ff ff call 354 <puts@plt> 45c: 8d 83 fc e4 ff ff lea -0x1b04(%ebx),%eax 462: 89 04 24 mov %eax,(%esp) 465: e8 ea fe ff ff call 354 <puts@plt> 46a: 83 c4 04 add $0x4,%esp 46d: 5b pop %ebx 46e: 5d pop %ebp 46f: c3 ret
The operands of the
CALL instructions are different and intelligent, and this means that they indicate something. It is not a simple padding anymore. Also it is worth mentioning that the recording of 0x1FF4 (0x1BAC + 0x448) into the EBX Registry is performed before the call of the
puts() function. The debugger helps to enquiry the initial EBX value, which is equal to 0x448. It means that it will prove useful later. 0x354 address leads us to the very interesting “.plt” section, which is marked as executable as well as “.text”. Here it is:
Disassembly of section .plt: 00000334 <__gmon_start__@plt-0x10>: 334: ff b3 04 00 00 00 pushl 0x4(%ebx) 33a: ff a3 08 00 00 00 jmp *0x8(%ebx) 340: 00 00 add %al,(%eax) ... 00000344 <__gmon_start__@plt>: 344: ff a3 0c 00 00 00 jmp *0xc(%ebx) 34a: 68 00 00 00 00 push $0x0 34f: e9 e0 ff ff ff jmp 334 <_init+0x30> 00000354 <puts@plt>: 354: ff a3 10 00 00 00 jmp *0x10(%ebx) 35a: 68 08 00 00 00 push $0x8 35f: e9 d0 ff ff ff jmp 334 <_init+0x30> 00000364 <__cxa_finalize@plt>: 364: ff a3 14 00 00 00 jmp *0x14(%ebx) 36a: 68 10 00 00 00 push $0x10 36f: e9 c0 ff ff ff jmp 334 <_init+0x30>
We detect three instructions at the 0x354 address, which we are interested in. In the first of them, the unconditional jump to address indicated by EBX (0x1FF4) plus 0x10 is performed. Having made simple calculations, we get the 0x2004 pointer value. These addresses are in the “.got.plt” section.
Disassembly of section .got.plt: 00001ff4 <.got.plt>: 1ff4: 20 1f and %bl,(%edi) ... 1ffe: 00 00 add %al,(%eax) 2000: 4a dec %edx 2001: 03 00 add (%eax),%eax 2003: 00 5a 03 add %bl,0x3(%edx) 2006: 00 00 add %al,(%eax) 2008: 6a 03 push $0x3 ...
The most interesting thing happens when we dereference this pointer and finally get the unconditional jump address, which is equal to 0x35A. But this is in essence the next instruction! Why should we perform such difficult manipulations and refer to the “.got.plt” section just to jump to the next instruction? What is PLT and GOT at all?
PLT stands for Procedure Linkage Table. It exists in both executables and libraries. It is an array of stubs, one per imported function call.
PLT[n+1]: jmp *GOT[n+3] push #n @push n as a signal to the resolver jmp PLT
A subroutine call to
PLT[n+1] will result jumping indirect through
GOT[n+3]. When first invoked,
GOT[n+3] points back to
PLT[n+1] + 6, which is the
PUSH\JMP sequence to
PLT. Going through the
PLT, the resolver uses the argument on the stack to determine 'n' and resolves the symbol 'n'. The resolver code then repairs
GOT[n+3] to point directly at the target subroutine and finally calls it. And each next call to
PLT[n+1], it will be directed to the target subroutine without being resolved by fixed
The first PLT entry is slightly different, and is used to form a trampoline to the fix up code.
PLT: push &GOT jmp GOT @points to resolver()
Thread is directed to the resolver routine. 'n' is already in the stack, and address of
GOT gets added to the stack. This is the way how the resolver (located in /lib/ld-linux.so.2) can determine, which library is asking for its service.
GOT is the Global Offset Table. The first 3 entries of it are special\reserved. When the GOT is set up for the first time, all the GOT entries relating to PLT fixups are pointing back to the code at
The special entries in the GOT are:
GOT linked list pointer used by the dynamic loader
GOT pointer to the relocation table for this module
GOT pointer to the fixup\resolver code, located in the ld-linux.so.2 library
.... indirect function call helpers, one per imported function
...... indirect pointers to the global data references, one per imported global symbol
Each library and executable gets its own PLT and GOT array.
The relocation of
R_386_JUMP_SLOT type, which was used in the libtest2.so library, works in the described way. Other types of relocation refer to the static linking that is why we do not need them.
The difference between the code, which depends on the position of loading to the memory, and the one that does not depend on it (PIC) consists in the methods of allowing of the call of imported functions.
Let’s make some useful conclusions:
- You can get all the information about imported and exported functions in the “.dynsym” section
- If the module was compiled in the PIC mode (
-fPICkey), the calls of the imported functions are performed via PLT and GOT; the relocation will be performed only once for each function and will be applied to the first instruction of a specific element in PLT. Information about such relocation can be found in the “.rel.plt” section
- If the
–fPICkey was not used during the library compilation, the relocations are performed on the operand of each relative
CALLinstruction as many times as the calls of some imported function are performed in the code. Information about such relocation can be found in the “.rel.dyn” section
–fPIC compilation key is required for the 64-bit architecture. It means that the allowing of the calls of imported functions is always performed via PLT\GOT in the 64-bit libraries. Sections with relocations are called “.rela.plt” and “.rela.dyn” on such architecture.
You have to know the following things to perform the redirections of the imported function in some dynamic link library:
- The path to this library in the file system
- The virtual address at which it is loaded
- The name of the function to be replaced
- The address of the substitute function
Also it is necessary to get the address of the original function in order to perform the backward redirection and thus to return everything on its place.
The prototype of the function for the redirection in the C language is as follows:
Here is the algorithm of the work of the redirection function:
- Open the library file.
- Store the index of the symbol in the “.dynsym” section, whose name corresponds to the name of the required function.
- Look through the “.rel.plt” section and search for the relocation for the symbol with the specified index.
- If such symbol is found, save its original address in order to restore it from the function later. Then write the address of the substitute function in the place that was specified in the relocation. This place is calculated as the sum of the address of the load of the library into the memory and the offset in the relocation. That is all. The substitution of the function address is performed. The redirection will be performed every time at the call of this function by the library. Exit the function and restore the address of the original symbol.
- If such symbol is not found in the “.rel.plt” section, search for it in the “rel.dyn” section likewise. But remember that in the “rel.dyn” section of relocations the symbol with the required index can be found not once. That is why you should not terminate the search loop after the first redirection. But you can store the address of the original symbol at the first coincidence and not to calculate it anymore, it will not change anyway.
- Restore the address of the original function or just NULL if the function with the required name was not found.
The code of this function in the C language is displayed below:
The full implementation of this function with test examples is attached to this article.
Let’s rewrite our test program:
gcc -g3 -m32 -shared -o libtest1.so libtest1.c gcc -g3 -m32 -fPIC -shared -o libtest2.so libtest2.c gcc -g3 -m32 -L$PWD -o test test.c elf_hook.c -ltest1 -ltest2 -ldl
Then start it:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH ./test
The output will be the following:
libtest1: 1st call to the original puts() libtest1: 2nd call to the original puts() libtest2: 1st call to the original puts() libtest2: 2nd call to the original puts() ----------------------------- libtest1: 1st call to the original puts() is HOOKED! libtest1: 2nd call to the original puts() is HOOKED! libtest2: 1st call to the original puts() is HOOKED! libtest2: 2nd call to the original puts() is HOOKED! ----------------------------- libtest1: 1st call to the original puts() libtest1: 2nd call to the original puts() libtest2: 1st call to the original puts() libtest2: 2nd call to the original puts()
It indicates the entire fulfillment of the task, which was formulated in the first part of the article.
This interesting question arises during the detailed examination of the function prototype for the redirection. After some research I managed to find out the method of discovering the address of the library loading by its descriptor, which is returned by the
dlopen() function. It is performed with the help of such macro:
There are no problems with the rewriting of the addresses, which the relocations from the “.rel.plt” section point to. In fact, the operand of the
JMP instruction of the corresponding element from the “.plt” section is rewritten. And the operands of such instruction are just addresses.
The situation is more interesting with the applying of relocations to the operands of the relative
CALL instructions (E8 code). Their jump addresses are calculated by formula:
address_of_a_function = CALL_argument + address_of_the_next_instruction
Thus, we can find out the address of the original function. Above mentioned formula gives us the value, which has to be written as an argument for the relative
CALL in order to perform the call of the necessary function:
CALL_argument = address_of_a_function - address_of_the_next_instruction
The “.rel.dyn” section gets into the segment, which is marked as “R E”. It means that you cannot simply write addresses. It is necessary to add the right for record for the page, which the relocation falls to. Do not forget to return everything on its places after the redirection. It is performed with the help of the
mprotect() function. The first parameter of this function is the address of the page, which contains the relocation. It must be always multiple of the page size. It is not difficult to calculate it: you should just zero some low bytes of the relocation address (depending on the page size):
For example, for pages of 4096 (0x1000) byte size on the 32-bit system, the expression above will be converted to:
The size of one page can be obtained by calling
As an exercise, you can write a plug-in for Firefox, which will redirect to itself all network calls of, e.g., Adobe Flash plug-in (libflashplayer.so). Thus, you can control all Adobe Flash traffic in the Internet from the Firefox process without the influence on the network calls of the explorer itself and other plug-ins.
Now you have a very convenient tool for the redirection of calls of the imported functions in the ELF dynamic link libraries. Good luck!